Back at Takimag, our grateful doctor reflects on his fortunate life while recollecting meetings with survivors of World War II POW camps.
Of late, I have thought of what I should like my epitaph to be: perhaps “He was not a nuisance.”
In his latest Epoch Times piece, our upstanding doctor lambastes an Oscar-winning film that attempts to glamorize the ‘oldest profession in the world.’
Censoriousness can easily translate into cruelty, which is no doubt why some people (in medical journals, for example) insist on renaming prostitution as “sex-work” and prostitutes as “sex-workers.” No one has yet done the same for pimps, however; they have not yet become “sex-work managers” in the mealy-mouths of those who employ the new euphemisms.
In his latest Takimag column, our nostalgic doctor reminisces about his youthful days as an English football fan after reading an article on the great Lionel Messi.
No doubt it is a sign of my gradual change of species from human being to dinosaur that I think it was a more civilized world (at least in some respects) then than it is now, one in which our scale of values was better, but I am glad to think that even now Lionel Messi shares it, even if The Washington Post does not.
Over at The Oldie, Dr. Dalrymple considers the danger posed by elderly drivers after reading a dubious Canadian study.
There is undoubtedly a tendency in modern society not to lift restrictions when they cease to be necessary, either because the risk has disappeared or because it never really existed in the first place.
The March issue of The Critic contains a piece by our skeptical doctor opining on the general mental state of the British populace.
But it is surely significant that authors and journals think that adding the phrase “It’s official” to a dubious statement strengthens its verisimilitude in the minds of their readers, who they assume cannot judge for themselves.
Those who do not exercise their judgement soon will have none.
Over at Law & Liberty, Dr. Dalrymple delves into the topic of scientific fraud and its apparent upswing in our postmodern age.
In the fight against dishonesty in scientific research, as in the fight against bad ideas, there is no final victory. An interesting question is why some, but not all, fraudulent ideas persist, despite exposure.
In his Takimag column, our film critic doctor castigates a new Hollywood movie that glorifies the abhorrent and awful Brutalist architecture.
Pretentiousness is almost as unpleasing as outright stupidity. I left the cinema with a relief similar to that which I feel after a visit to the dentist.
Over at The Epoch Times, our astute doctor calls out vile, young would-be radicals who condone murder as well as the state-run, socialist British health care system.
In other words, they are against the death penalty when it follows a trial by due process, but when it is administered ad hoc, in the name of a supposed higher cause such as economic equality, by people handsome enough to be admired, they are perfectly willing to excuse, countenance it, or even advocate it. I find this appalling and sinister.
In last week’s Takimag, our disturbed doctor points out different examples of what he calls “juridico-political idiocies” in England and France.
The basis of our law is that a man is not to be punished unless he has been found guilty beyond reasonable doubt, and not for what he might do in the future. The system of parole upends this principle completely and is unjust in two directions.